Body Armour refers to protecting gear resembling ballistic armour, armoured vests, body armour, ballistic helmets, demining armour, IED fits, ceramic, polythene and steel armour plates, face shields and anti-riot armour for the military and police across the world . Today, modern forms of body armor are called bulletproof or bullet-resistant clothing. Modern protective vests have been created to minimize the injury from projectiles from handguns, shotguns and rifles. With that, it is commonly worn by police forces, military and private security and civilians. The legality of the issuance of body armors such as bulletproof vests is dictated the jurisdiction of the state law and other government law-enforcement agencies. With the recent rise of urban conflicts, protective bulletproof clothing has offered a wearable and affordable kind of confidence and security.
In a world, dominated by a growing lack of respect for Military Defence forces, appropriate solutions are required. A lack of inadequate personal safety measures can put a lone worker or frontline operative at unnecessary risk, and cause unacceptable injury or harm. Body armour and stab vests have therefore regrettably become a necessity within a number of domestic frontline professions.
These protective products are used by the police, military and private security companies in over 35 international locations including the South African Army, South African Navy, Irish Army, Indonesian Military, Armed Forces of Malta, Chilean Armed Forces, Dutch Special Forces, Thailand Navy and US Army; and a number of police forces in the UK and US in addition to the South African Police Companies, Turkish National Police, Saudi Arabia Police, Oman Police, German Police, Belgian Police and Bermuda Police.
Navy physique armour is available in a multitude of configurations: ballistic, stab resistant, twin purpose fragmentation resistant and flotation. They are comprised of a variety of ballistic materials, together with: woven and unidirectional (protect) aramid and excessive efficiency polyethylene.
The outcome is of great relevance to the question: 'Body Armour - Why?' The main risks areas highlighted by the HSL are as follows: - Visiting people in their house or office to enforce legal guidelines, police the system or having to give bad news. - Certain geographical areas or trouble spots are high risk, such as poor or run down council estates. - Dealing with certain high risk individuals, such as potentially violent or aggressive members of the public, drug users or dealers, or mentally ill individuals. - Dealing with frustrated and disappointed customers (e.g. customers unhappy with the service your organisation has provided) - Working late at night. - Evicting people from their home - even if Battle Tanks are being used to help.
Visiting clients in unfamiliar industrial and domestic premises. - Visiting unoccupied buildings Several more reasons can be highlighted, deciding not to issue potentially life saving body armour or stab vests even more controversial. Corporate manslaughter and corporate homicide laws as well as health & safety regulations have been rewritten in countries around the world, in order to protect those who serve and risk their lives for others. The high cost of facing potential legal action after a fatal or non-fatal incident and the cost of injured employees taking time off would outweigh the one-off cost of body armour. Assaults on personnel who are not wearing protective clothing also create bad publicity for the Authority concerned, not to mention the welfare of the person involved and operational problems resulting from the injured Maritime Security staff being incapable to work.
In 2003 the UK's Health and Safety Laboratory developed 18 case studies and approached over 400 organisations of various sizes and across a range of different occupations. Very detailed questionnaires were sent and interviews were conducted by the HSL with the selected organisations and the information which they provided formed the basis of these widely respected case studies.
Yes, 'perception' is one of the most crucial issues within personal safety, and I greatly agree with the fact that overt body armour can often be perceived as very confrontational, especially when dealing with intoxicated members of the public or those who seriously dislike authority, your organisation or presence to begin with. For me, lone workers dealing with the public should be doing their utmost to express themselves as peaceful ambassadors within their line of work. Only covert body armour allow them to do exactly that, whilst still being protected.
Physique armour is usually developed in quite a few designs and configurations. Among the most advanced armour options have been developed and can be found for each the male and female kinds and embody shaped choices for optimum safety and comfort. This text explores the assorted sorts of body armour available today. Proceed reading below to learn extra about how they're used. Normal objective protective vests are designed as a primary armour vests for the Police and personal security companies. They provide entrance, again and aspect ballistic protection. Concealable Vests have been designed to comply with the contours of the physique and provide front, back and facet ballistic protection. High visible operations garments have been designed to be used by personnel who have to be simply identified akin to traffic police.
Police Assault Vests are designed for over-the-uniform wear, offering full entrance, again, aspect, neck and shoulder ballistic protection. They're usually used by Police, Army and Particular Forces. Army Assault vests are designed to be excessive-mobility front opening vests and are to be worn over a soldier’s uniform. They often have front, back, aspect and shoulder ballistic protection; with ballistic collar and throat protector, and removable groin protector.
Demining Vests have been especially designed for deminers and specialists in the Military and Police who seek for mines and explosives. These vests are designed to offer the utmost potential protection towards fragments and explosions from detonating mines. They supply entrance, again and side fragmentation safety; with removable groin protectors.
Demining Aprons are additionally particularly designed for deminers and Gao specialists in the Army and Police who seek for mines and explosives. These suits are designed to offer the utmost attainable protection towards fragments and explosions from detonating anti-personnel mines.
IED search fits are particularly designed for specialists in the Army and Police who seek for Improvised Explosive Units (IEDs). These suits are designed to offer full physique protection towards fragments and explosions. Armour plates are normally made from excessive-efficiency steel, ceramic and lightweight polyethylene armour plates, designed to fit all these vests and supply protection against excessive-velocity weapons, masking NIJ Degree III and IV (armour piercing).
The fact is that there is always an 'unknown' level of risk due to unforeseen circumstances. Ordinary risk assessments might often conclude in the verdict of 'low risk', however these often very basic risk assessments are based on technical facts or 'on-hand information' only, and while I appreciate them, they often do not exceed these facts. A risk assessment dealing with the activity of a lone worker having to enter someone else's property or deal with customers or clients on a one-to-one basis can in my opinion, never ever result in low risk. The moment a lone worker walks through someone's door or deals with often unfamiliar members of the public at another location, one can simply not know who else will be in the house, who else might enter the house at a later point, what activities have taken place prior to your colleagues visit or who else might be going to interfere or engage in their conversation or argument at a later point.
If you were driving a car and your petrol light comes on, indicating you only have a bit of petrol left. What would you do? Would you start thinking: Will I make it home or not? Some people would be willing to take the risk in this situation. In the workplace though, in my view, it is the duty of the employer to not allow their employees to take unknown risks of their own accord without the provision of gear and training to protect them should they make a mistake in their own judgement. 'Better safe than sorry' and 'Prevention is better than cure' are two great sayings, making more sense within corporate health & safety than just about anywhere else. I hope you would stop and get some fuel, because you want to be on the safe side. You might have made it, but you didn't want to take that risk. The bottom line is you cannot afford to break down. The fact that a lone workers activity involves a rather 'unknown risk' must urge key decision makers to remain at least open minded when it comes to body armour or additional lone worker safety training that can be made available.
Suggesting body armour does not mean we suggest you are in danger, we simply say that you will have a greater chance of remaining unharmed in the unlikely, but possible, case of something going wrong. Wearing personal protective equipment can be compared to wearing a seat belt when driving a car. We do not put the seat belt on because we believe we are going to have an accident today. We are simply acknowledging the fact that there is an exceptionally small chance that we might crash. Yet, if this chance becomes reality, you have increased the chance of survival by wearing a seat belt.
Latest Comments